Stanton D. Levenson, P.A., Law Offices - Call 24 Hours a Day at 412-889-7270

Blog

Welcome to the blog for Stanton D. Levenson, Pittsburgh-based defense attorney. This blog has been designed to help individuals dealing with defense cases gain access to helpful resources, and learn more about the topics affecting their lives. Check us out here, too, for reactions to important defense cases and examination of other legal issues.

Lessons Learned from Jurors: Sex and Drug Cases Tried in Pittsburgh Criminal Court

August 11th, 2010

Our recent blog post talks about how closely jurors watch how everyone behaves in the courtroom, and this reminded me of two interesting examples I thought I’d share with you today.

I had a case involving a schoolteacher, who was accused of sexual assault on seven of his thirteen-year-old female students. While ultimately, he was acquitted, the first time around the jury convicted him.

The jury included six men and six women, and the client did not testify. Even though I believed he wasn’t guilty, I did not think he would be a good witness.

The jury convicted him on half of the charges and acquitted him on half.

I had occasion to speak with the jurors afterward. And what was interesting was, the jurors said they knew he was guilty of the charges they’d convicted him on because, as each of these young girls testified about the alleged sexual assault, he refused to look at them and instead looked down at the table.

It was from that, the jurors felt the defendant was embarrassed, ashamed and guilty.

That was an incredibly important lesson for me, not only in terms of the re-trial of this case but for all other cases since. Not evidence, but appearance, body language and the erroneous impressions jurors draw from them can make or break a case.

Another important thing I learned from years of being in front of a jury is that jurors watch how you treat your client.

Early in my career, I represented a young man who was charged with the distribution of drugs.

We had no defense to the charges, but couldn’t get a deal that made sense. So we picked a jury and went to trial.

And while I don’t recall my argument to the jury– lo and behold, the defendant was acquitted, leading me to believe I must really be a terrific lawyer.

Fortunately, about a week later I ran into one of the jurors walking down the street. He stopped me, we talked about the case, and I asked him what the basis for the acquittal was.

And he looked me in the eye and said, “Stan, we knew your client was innocent.”

I said, “Of course he was. But how did you know that?”

He said, “Well, the way you treated him. You were so nice to him and you put your arm around him. We knew that you wouldn’t have acted that way if he was a guilty person.”

Again, a fascinating lesson about human nature.

—Stanton D. Levenson

Advice for Defendants Preparing for Criminal Trial

August 6th, 2010

Defending yourself on criminal charges can be one of the most terrifying experiences of your life. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based criminal defense lawyer, Stanton D. Levenson, shares the advice he gives his own clients during this difficult time:

Don’t Let Your Body Language Mislead the Jurors

During jury trials, jurors carefully study all the participants—the lawyers, the client, the witnesses and the judge. This is because of the very nature of the jury trial itself. Jurors are restricted to the jury box and aren’t able to speak to one another in the courtroom. This gives them a lot of time for keen observation of everyone’s habits and mannerisms. This body language and behavior gets interpreted in a variety of ways, but some of them can pose a problem for defendants.

So Don’t:

  • …look down/avoid eye contact with the witnesses and jury
  • …look ashamed or embarrassed
  • …try to stare down the witness or intimidate them

Do:

  • …look at the witness and jury like you would anyone else under normal circumstances

Appearances Count

A defendant with a clean, neat appearance shows respect for the court, and an understanding of the seriousness of the defendant’s circumstances. But there are a few things to avoid…

Don’t:

  • overdress for the occasion. if you don’t normally get dressed up, don’t dress up for trial. Jurors are good at detecting phoniness and manipulation, and you will lose credibility with the court
  • come into the court room unclean, wrinkled or otherwise sloppy.

Do:

  • dress as you ordinarily do. If you’re a businessperson who is often dressed up, then a suit would be appropriate. If you ordinarily dress more casually, then this the way to dress in court.

Avoid Common Mistakes

There are a number of mistakes individuals accused of a crime make as their trial approaches. Some helpful tips can help you avoid these pitfalls.

Don’t:

  • discuss the case with non-lawyers. Attorneys who specialize in criminal law understand the complex legal system, and what may seem like common sense to a person not familiar with the law is not necessarily helpful from a legal perspective. While your friends, family and neighbors may be very concerned for you and want to help you in any way they can, the best thing you can do for yourself is to restrict your discussion of the case to your own legal team.
  • try to do your own research. Again, the court system has its own complex language, and unless you’re well-versed in it, you may actually do more harm than good by trying to tackle your own research.
  • compare your case with other, similar cases. Each case is entirely unique, and one case generally has nothing to do with another case, no matter how similar they initially may seem.

Do:

  • make sure your lawyer explains to you the strategy, and why he or she may be asking certain questions and not others.
  • tell your lawyer what you would like to see him or her doing regarding your case, and share any ideas you might have. Sometimes clients have ideas that lawyers might not think of because the client is so close to the circumstances that led to the charges. A collaborative experience with your lawyer will serve you best.

Things To Keep in Mind as Trial Approaches

Defending yourself against criminal charges may be the most frightening time you’ll ever face. But as your trial approaches, it’s important to remember the following:

  • This is a limited-time event. It will be over at some point.
  • Yes, the trial may be life-changing. But do not let it alter every aspect of your life. Life will go on, as painful as it may seem now.

For more information on this topic, or if you have a criminal case you’re concerned about, contact the criminal defense offices of Stanton D. Levenson here.

What Should You Look for in a Defense Lawyer?

June 24th, 2010

When you’re facing criminal charges, choosing the right defense lawyer becomes one of your most powerful, life-changing decisions. Whether you’re charged with white collar crime, drug crime, federal crime, or a sex crime, a quality defense attorney can mean the difference between rebuilding your life, or facing consequences that span a lifetime.

So how do you choose the right defense lawyer to help you through this difficult time?

Credentials That Count
Experience counts when it comes to choosing a good defense lawyer. But how do you know what sort of experience to look for? There are a number of associations and other professional groups to which a truly serious criminal defense attorney will belong. These include:

  • Membership in the statewide criminal bar. For instance, here in Pennsylvania, it’s the Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. From our practice, Stanton D. Levenson was actually a founding member and past president of this organization.
  • Membership in the national criminal bar: the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
  • Membership in the American Board of Criminal Lawyers. This is by invitation-only, selecting from a small group of criminal defense attorneys nationwide.
  • Inclusion in the Super Lawyers directory for your state. For our practice area, it’s the Pennsylvania Super Lawyers directory.
  • Inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America directory.

Strong Reputation Among Clients and Fellow Attorneys
The best way to find a talented criminal defense attorney is a lot like the way you might find a good doctor— ask people you know and trust to give you a referral. Talk to lawyers you know, and find out who they would recommend. A criminal lawyer with a positive reputation in the legal field says a lot about how he or she will work with you and handle your case.

Good Communication
Being charged with a crime can be a lot like waking up in a foreign country where you don’t speak the language. Your defense lawyer has a responsibility to demystify this process for you, in terms you can understand. This means not only explaining the issues that concern you, but also taking the time and having the patience to answer all your questions. Just think: if your defense lawyer is unable to explain important information clearly to you, how will that lawyer present critical information to a judge and jury?

Ability to Work Together
The results of your criminal defense affect your life. With so much at stake, it’s vital to choose a defense attorney you feel comfortable with. Remember, during this time you and your criminal defense lawyer must be a team. You want a lawyer who will treat you as an equal, and not be dictatorial with you and your case. Remember, you are the client.

A Caseload That Gives Your Case the Time it Deserves
Find out how many cases your potential criminal defense lawyer takes on at a time. If he or she is juggling many cases at once, you may find that attorney has little time to devote to your case. That’s why in our practice, we intentionally keep the practice small, working diligently with a limited number of cases at a time. This assures Stanton D. Levenson will have the time needed to dedicate to each individual case– and that makes a huge difference to our clients. Make sure your case isn’t just another number for your lawyer.

When Looking for a Defense Lawyer, Ask Yourself:

  • Are all my questions being answered in ways I understand?
  • Do I have confidence in my defense lawyer?
  • Is my criminal defense attorney giving me the time my case requires?
  • Does he or she belong to the important criminal defense associations in the field?
  • Is my attorney experienced, with a positive reputation among clients and peers?

If the answer to any of these questions is “no,” your criminal defense lawyer might not be the right fit for you. So contact us. We’re here to make a difference.

Drug Crimes Defense Case Recap: Tommy Chong, Bong Manufacturers and “Operation Sweet Dreams”

May 26th, 2010

Sometimes the feds take on prosecutions which, but for their seriousness, make you scratch your head in wonder. One such prosecution was in 2003– the infamous “Operation Sweet Dreams,” which targeted bong makers and sellers.

Among those charged was counter-culture icon Tommy Chong. I represented Tommy, the only first-time offender of the group to receive jail time: nine months.

Attorney General at the time, John Ashcroft, and former Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan took the ludicrous position that closing down bong makers and sellers would somehow reduce drug usage.  Approximately 50 individuals from all over the country were prosecuted here in Pittsburgh. This is not a distinction we should be proud of.

Tommy’s son Paris, a glass blower, was creating and selling bongs over the internet, and Tommy and his wife had financed their son’s venture. The only way to assure that Tommy’s wife and son would not be prosecuted was for Tommy and Paris’ corporation to agree to plead guilty.

The feds received much well-deserved criticism for spending in excess of $12 million of our money to make the world safe from these 50 bongsters. However, the feds felt that by bagging America’s poster boy for marijuana, the public would somehow see what a significant prosecution this was.

Independent film maker Josh Gilbert made a wonderful, hilarious, and highly-acclaimed documentary of this wasteful and meaningless federal exercise. It is titled A.K.A. Tommy Chong and plays occasionally on Showtime.

I had the pleasure of making my film debut in this movie. Unfortunately, additional offers have not rolled in.

As an interesting sidenote, when the feds raided Tommy’s home in Los Angeles, they seized five pounds of marijuana which was Tommy’s personal stash.  No law enforcement agency in L.A. was interested in prosecuting Tommy for possession of the five pounds, because the quantity was considered too insignificant!

Is there a lesson to be learned here?

–Stanton D. Levenson

Current Sex Offense Case and the Registration Requirements of Megan’s Law

May 18th, 2010

Sex offense cases pose a particularly difficult challenge when they implicate the onerous, unfair, ineffective, and totally counter-productive Megan’s law registration requirements.

In Pennsylvania, certain sex offenses carry a ten year registration requirement, while other sex offenses mandate a lifetime registration. Failure to register is a separate crime punishable by a separate term of imprisonment.

Yesterday I represented a young man at his Preliminary Hearing for four sex abuse related offenses. Two of the offenses carried a ten year registration requirement.

Prior to the hearing, the Assistant District Attorney offered the following plea bargain: in exchange for waiving the hearing, the D.A. would withdraw two of the charges and recommend a sentence of probation.

One of the two charges that the Defendant would have been required to plead guilty to carried a ten year registration requirement. The Defendant rejected the offer.

We then had the hearing. Based upon my cross-examination of the alleged victim, I was able to persuade the District Magistrate to dismiss the two counts carrying the registration requirements.

We will have a trial in criminal court on the remaining two counts. The Magistrate’s decision deprives the D.A. of a valuable and unfair negotiating tool– the ten year registration requirement. In addition, by having the invaluable opportunity of cross-examining the alleged victim at this early stage of the proceedings, I was able to develop information which should pave the way to a successful result at trial.

–Stanton D. Levenson