×

Pittsburgh Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer

Home /  Pittsburgh Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer

Pittsburgh Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer

Strategic Post-Conviction Relief Representation in Pennsylvania

A criminal conviction does not necessarily mark the end of the legal process. In some circumstances, legal errors, newly discovered evidence, constitutional violations, or other issues may provide grounds to challenge a conviction or sentence through post-conviction proceedings.

Levenson Law Firm represents individuals seeking post-conviction relief in Pennsylvania state and federal courts. Whether you are pursuing a direct appeal, relief under Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), challenging a federal conviction, or seeking federal habeas corpus relief, careful legal analysis and strategic advocacy are essential.

Every post-conviction case begins with a thorough review of the trial record, court filings, applicable law, and procedural history. Effective representation requires identifying viable legal claims, evaluating available evidence, and developing a strategy tailored to the client’s circumstances and objectives.

Every conviction deserves careful review. Effective post-conviction representation begins with understanding what occurred—and whether the law provides a remedy.

The strategy depends on the case. The commitment does not.

Post-Conviction Relief in Pennsylvania

Post-conviction proceedings allow individuals to challenge criminal convictions or sentences under limited circumstances established by Pennsylvania and federal law. These proceedings differ from a direct appeal and generally focus on constitutional violations, ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or other legal errors that may have affected the outcome of the case.

Depending on the circumstances, post-conviction relief may involve:

  • Petitions under Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA)
  • Federal habeas corpus proceedings
  • Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
  • Constitutional violations
  • Newly discovered evidence
  • Illegal or unlawful sentences
  • Sentencing errors
  • Appeals and related post-conviction proceedings

Every case presents unique procedural requirements and filing deadlines. Understanding the available legal remedies is essential before deciding how to proceed.

State and Federal Post-Conviction Proceedings

Post-conviction matters may arise in Pennsylvania state courts or federal courts depending on the conviction being challenged and the legal issues involved. Each forum has its own procedural rules, filing deadlines, and legal standards.

Because post-conviction litigation is highly technical, missing a filing deadline or failing to properly preserve a claim may affect the availability of future relief. Early legal evaluation is often critical.

Potential Grounds for Post-Conviction Relief

Not every conviction may be challenged through post-conviction proceedings. Whether relief is available depends on the facts of the case, the procedural history, and the applicable law.

Potential grounds for relief may include ineffective assistance of counsel, constitutional violations, newly discovered evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, sentencing errors, or other legal defects recognized under Pennsylvania or federal law.

Because strict procedural rules and filing deadlines apply, it is important to evaluate your case as early as possible.

Our Approach to Post-Conviction Relief

Post-conviction matters require a careful review of the entire case. Trial transcripts, court filings, prior motions, appellate decisions, sentencing records, and available evidence must be evaluated to determine whether a viable claim exists and whether procedural requirements have been satisfied.

At Levenson Law Firm, we begin by reviewing the record, identifying potential legal and constitutional issues, evaluating filing deadlines, and developing a strategy based on the client’s circumstances, objectives, and the procedural posture of the case.

Depending on the matter, that strategy may include preparing a PCRA petition, pursuing federal habeas corpus relief, litigating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, presenting newly discovered evidence, challenging an unlawful sentence, or seeking appellate review.

The strategy depends on the case. The commitment does not.

When Should You Contact a Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer?

Post-conviction claims are governed by strict procedural rules and filing deadlines. You should consider contacting a post-conviction relief lawyer if:

  • You believe your trial or plea counsel was ineffective.
  • You have discovered new evidence that was not available earlier.
  • You believe your constitutional rights were violated.
  • You believe your sentence is unlawful or was imposed in error.
  • Your direct appeal has concluded and you want to evaluate further legal options.
  • You are seeking relief from a Pennsylvania or federal conviction.

Early legal review can help identify available claims, preserve important rights, and avoid missing deadlines that may affect the ability to pursue relief.

Why Clients Choose Levenson Law Firm

Clients work directly with Amy Jones throughout the representation. We intentionally maintain a limited caseload so that every post-conviction matter receives the time, preparation, and individualized attention these cases require.

We provide candid advice, explain the available options, and develop a legal strategy based on the record, the applicable law, the client’s circumstances, and what is at stake.

No lawyer can honestly promise a particular outcome. What we can promise is careful preparation, sound professional judgment, and committed representation throughout every stage of the case.

The strategy depends on the case. The commitment does not.

Speak with a Pittsburgh Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer

If you are seeking to challenge a conviction or sentence, contact Levenson Law Firm to discuss your situation and available legal options.

Request a Confidential Consultation or call Amy Jones directly at (917) 406-7165.

Practice Areas

Testimonials

Case Results