Healthcare fraud investigations often begin long before criminal charges are filed. A subpoena, civil investigative demand, audit, search warrant, target letter, grand jury investigation, or request for billing and patient records may indicate that state or federal authorities are examining reimbursement claims, coding practices, referrals, prescriptions, or other aspects of healthcare operations.
Levenson Law Firm represents healthcare professionals, executives, business owners, billing personnel, and other individuals facing serious Pennsylvania state and federal healthcare fraud investigations and prosecutions throughout Pittsburgh and Western Pennsylvania.
Healthcare fraud cases frequently involve extensive billing records, patient files, financial documents, electronic communications, audit results, witness testimony, and complicated regulatory issues. Effective criminal defense begins with examining what the government must prove, evaluating the records in context, and identifying what the evidence establishes—and what it does not.
Criminal charges begin with allegations. Effective criminal defense begins with understanding what the evidence proves—and what it does not.
From there, we develop a legal strategy tailored to the facts, the law, and the individual client.
The strategy depends on the case. The commitment does not.
Healthcare fraud generally involves allegations that an individual or organization knowingly submitted false claims, made material misrepresentations, concealed important information, or participated in a scheme involving healthcare benefits, services, or reimbursement.
Cases may involve private insurers, Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, workers’ compensation programs, prescription benefit programs, or other public and private healthcare payors.
Healthcare fraud allegations may arise from claims involving:
Not every billing error, coding dispute, documentation problem, overpayment, or regulatory violation constitutes criminal fraud. The government must prove the required criminal intent and each element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
Healthcare fraud investigations may begin through billing audits, data analysis, whistleblower allegations, employee complaints, insurer reviews, regulatory inquiries, suspicious claims, civil litigation, or referrals from another government agency.
Investigators may seek:
Investigations may involve the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, the Department of Justice, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Medicaid fraud investigators, or other agencies connected to the allegations.
Early legal guidance can be important before responding to investigators, producing records, participating in interviews, or attempting to explain disputed billing or reimbursement practices.
Healthcare fraud matters may involve more than a criminal investigation. The same allegations may also lead to civil claims, repayment demands, professional disciplinary proceedings, licensing consequences, exclusion from government healthcare programs, or administrative action.
Parallel proceedings can create significant strategic issues. Information provided in an audit, licensing matter, civil response, or administrative proceeding may later be reviewed by criminal investigators or prosecutors.
The defense strategy should account for the relationship among the criminal, civil, regulatory, employment, and professional consequences of the investigation.
The elements depend on the specific offense charged. In general, prosecutors may attempt to prove that the accused knowingly participated in a scheme to submit false claims, obtain healthcare funds through deception, conceal material information, or improperly influence healthcare referrals or payments.
Important issues may include:
Healthcare billing systems are often complicated, and responsibility may be divided among providers, coders, billers, administrators, contractors, and outside companies. Identifying who knew what, who made the relevant decisions, and how claims were submitted is often central to the defense.
Healthcare fraud prosecutions frequently depend on large volumes of records and electronic data. Those materials must be reviewed in context rather than accepted solely through summaries, spreadsheets, statistical analyses, or selected examples prepared by investigators.
Depending on the circumstances, the defense may examine:
Healthcare fraud cases often require careful review of both the legal requirements and the practical realities of medical care, documentation, billing, and reimbursement.
The appropriate defense depends on the facts, the available evidence, the client’s role, and the stage of the investigation or prosecution.
Potential issues may include:
Every healthcare fraud case requires careful analysis of the government’s theory, the billing and medical records, the applicable regulations, and the client’s actual responsibilities.
A healthcare fraud conviction may result in imprisonment, fines, restitution, supervised release, forfeiture, and other criminal penalties. Sentencing may be affected by the alleged loss, the number of claims or patients involved, the client’s role, and any proposed sentencing enhancements.
The collateral consequences may be equally significant. Healthcare fraud allegations may affect:
Because criminal, civil, regulatory, and professional consequences may overlap, the defense strategy should consider the full range of risks from the beginning of the investigation.
Healthcare fraud investigations may involve allegations of other state or federal offenses, including:
The presence of multiple allegations may affect the complexity of the case, the potential sentencing exposure, and the strategy required.
Clients work directly with Amy Jones throughout the representation. Levenson Law Firm intentionally maintains a limited caseload so that each matter receives the time, preparation, and individualized attention serious healthcare fraud cases require.
We begin by examining the government’s theory, reviewing the available billing, medical, financial, and electronic evidence, identifying legal and factual issues, and understanding the client’s professional responsibilities and objectives.
Depending on the case, representation may include advising a client during an investigation, responding to subpoenas or document demands, communicating with prosecutors and investigators, coordinating with licensing or regulatory counsel, challenging evidence, preparing for trial, negotiating an appropriate resolution, or developing a sentencing and mitigation strategy.
No lawyer can honestly promise a particular result. What we can promise is careful preparation, sound professional judgment, candid advice, and individualized representation throughout every stage of the case.
The strategy depends on the case. The commitment does not.