Stanton
D. Levenson, P.A.
Law Offices
Over the last ten years, there has been a proliferation in prosecutors charging sex offense cases. This is especially true concerning high school and college students. Stanton D. Levenson, P.A. Law Offices, in Pittsburgh, has extensive experience and a winning track record in this area.
Our father-daughter team of Stanton D. Levenson and Amy B. Levenson Jones collaborates on every case they take. Stan brings experience, proven techniques and straight talk. Amy brings youth, new thinking and a female perspective.
When your future is at stake, it’s smart to have our team of two fighting on your behalf. Review some of our representative cases below.
Post-conviction proceedings resulted in a sentence of one year of time served.
Obtained plea deal to one count of simple assault and a sentence of one year probation without SORNA requirements.
Appeal successful.
Facing 10-to-27 years imprisonment, the defendant was sentenced to six years of probation.
He testified that she consented. She denied it. However, at the preliminary hearing, she admitted that she invited the Defendant to her dorm room and showed him a photo album of her modeling underwear. The Defendant filed a motion for production of the photo album which he then introduced into evidence. The jury acquitted.
Defendant had purchased the book 30 years earlier at a university bookstore. At the time Defendant purchased the book, it was not a crime to possess child pornography. He was acquitted.
He immediately sought mental health counseling. On that basis, he was given deferred prosecution, thereby enabling him to keep his job.
At the time the accusations were made, the son was living with his mother, who was going through a bitter divorce and custody proceeding with the Defendant. The son had a long and well-documented history of mental illness. Based upon those factors, the Defendant was acquitted.
He was acquitted on the basis of cross-examination, which exposed numerous lies and inconsistencies.
He denied the accusation and presented evidence of his excellent character and reputation in the community. He also presented witnesses who testified to the alleged victim’s poor reputation in the community for truthfulness and honesty. The jury acquitted him.
He was acquitted based upon the lapse of time in making a complaint and cross-examination exposing the implausibility of her story.
He received a sentence substantially below the guidelines based upon the argument that the child pornography guidelines should be ignored since they are based upon congressional direction and not upon empirical research.
He was acquitted after the introduction of work records showed she wasn’t working on the night of the alleged incident.
He met her at a party, and they went outside together. He testified that their sexual activity was consensual. She denied it. She also denied having anything to drink. After photos of her dancing on a table holding a bottle of beer were introduced into evidence, Defendant was acquitted.