Stanton
D. Levenson, P.A.
Law Offices
When you’re looking for results during this difficult time in your life, Stanton D. Levenson, P.A. Law Offices, in Pittsburgh, works hard on your behalf with expertise and understanding. We give every case we take personalized attention in order to achieve the best possible outcome.
Attorneys Stanton D. Levenson and Amy B. Levenson Jones collaborate on every case they take. Stan brings experience, proven techniques, and straight-talk. Amy brings youth, new thinking, and a female perspective.
Below are just a few of the criminal cases we’ve helped people resolve through hard work, perseverance, and experience.
Defendant was acquitted of all charges based on effective cross-examination and presentation of negative character testimony regarding one of the prosecution’s key witnesses.
By demonstrating that the defendant was experiencing a mental health episode, the defendant was accepted into an Accelerated Disposition Program (ARD) and all charges were expunged from their record following completion of the program.
He was sentenced below the guidelines to house arrest and work release based upon a downward departure for the extraordinary delay between the commission of the offense and his arrest. Psychiatric testimony confirmed the harm he suffered during the intervening period.
She was sentenced substantially below the guidelines to a halfway house and work release based upon expert testimony establishing her addiction to gambling.
His sentence of 5 months incarceration was substantially below the guidelines based upon his extraordinary community service.
He was acquitted by a federal jury after aggressive cross-examination of the cooperating witnesses.
His motion to suppress evidence was granted due to proof of racial profiling.
He was sentenced below the guidelines based, in part, upon the District Attorney having the case removed to federal court to avoid an anticipated favorable ruling on Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence.
Defendant was acquitted of 90% of the alleged tax loss based upon testimony from a travel industry expert and an expert tax witness.
He was acquitted on the basis of photos showing the impossibility of the officer’s version of the incident. The Defendant then sued the city and was awarded damages.
He was convicted of manslaughter after expert psychiatric testimony established that he suffered from “battered brother syndrome.”
The defendant was acquitted after an aggressive cross-examination exposed numerous lies and inconsistencies.